| 
 
	 
	  
	
	  
	
	
	
	Hypocephalus of Shishaq (Sheshonq) 
	
	שִׁישַׁק 
	
	
	
	The above facsimile represents Michael Lyon’s masterful reconstruction of 
	the Shishaq Hypocephalus. See M. Lyon, “Appreciating Hypocephali as Works of Art and Faith”, FARMS Book of Abraham Lecture 
	Series, 1999. Numbers, corresponding to Book of Abraham Facsimile 2, have been 
	inserted, and Figure 7 has been adjusted (slightly) to more authentically 
	represent the Egyptian depiction. See other Hypocephali (below). As an 
	artist and careful researcher, M. Lyon may have been a little conflicted: Should he be 
	true to the Egyptian, or to the “Mormon” representation? There happens to be 
	an ancient point of view that reconciles both. 
	
 
	
	ADAPTED EXPLANATION 
	
	
	Fig. 1.
	
	Kolob 
	כּלב
	(after, like, as the heart, as the mind) 
	or  
	כּוֹל-לב (all heart, 
	whole heart), 
	signifying the first creation, nearest to the celestial, or 
	the residence of God; which residence the 
	Ah-meh-strah-ans [esoteric "Egyptians"] called 
	E-Beth-Ka.
	First in government, the last pertaining to the measurement of time. 
	The measurement according to celestial time, which celestial time 
	signifies one day to an 
	amah 
	אַמָה . 
	 
	 (One Day To A Cubit) One day in Kolob is equal to 
	a thousand years 
	according to the measurement of this earth, which is called by the Ah-meh-strah-ans 
	[ , sacred 
	Tetragrammaton like name of the Earth],
	Oan or Ah-e being 
	the temporal world after 
	Zub-zool-eh 
	(the earth as it was in the beginning); the 
	whole earth in her paradisiacal glory being 
	Beth-ku-ain-trieth
	
	[see Note א].
	(Tehilah (Ps.) 84:10)
	
	Note: “Kolob 
	in the second degree. It signfies the wonder of Abraham the 
	eldest of all the stars, the 
	greatest body of the heavenly bodies that ever was discovered by man” 
(Grammar and Alphabet of the Ahmehstrahan 
	Language 2nd Part, 2nd Degree, “Kolob”,
	
	pg. 32.) 
	
	
“Kolob in the first degree, It signifies the first great grand governing 
	fixed Star which is the 
	fartherest that ever has been discovered by the fathers which was discovered by Methuselar and also by Abraham” 
(Grammar and Alphabet of the Ahmehstrahan 
	Language, 2nd Part, 1st Degree, “Kolob”,
	
	pg. 34.) 
	
	
	 The constellation of the seated queen Cassiopeia appears near, and points directly to the 
	Andromeda Galaxy (M31). The shining nucleus or bulge of the spiral galaxy is 
	in fact, the oldest,
	largest, and  
	most distant
	 object in the night sky that ancient humans could have beheld naturally. 
	  
	
	 
	
	Not constrained 
	by a modern 
	astrophysical definition  of what constitutes a “star”, ancient Hebrews would have likely referred to the 
	shining nucleus or bulge of M31 as 
	“kokab be-anan” 
	
	כּוֹכָב בֶּעָנָן, 
	“star in a cloud”. 
	(Abraham 3:13,
	16) 
	This fits the description in Joseph Smith’s Grammar and Alphabet of the Ah-meh-strah-an 
	Language, 2nd Part, 5th Degree, “Flos isis”,
	 
	
	pg. 25. See also Tehilim (Ps.) 97:2. 
	
	
	What ancients saw as a kokab in a cloud (the shining 
	heart of M31) was actually a great cosmic creation composed of many stars. This creation is appropriately portrayed symbolically as the many headed, multifaceted 
	Egyptian deity at the heart of the hypocephalus. 
	See also the hypocephali below in Note ד. Moreover, the ancients 
	likely beheld in the Andromeda Galaxy (M31) a “kokab ka-leb be-anan”, 
	a “star as the heart in a cloud” - the shining heart of a distant heavenly temple, a 
	far off celestial Holy of Holies. To reveal the veiled Kolob 
	at the heart of our own galaxy (the Milky Way), would require 
	a means of disclosing invisible infrared and x-ray “light” 
	passing the nebular curtains of the Milky Way. It would require an 
	Urim v'Tumim. (Abraham 3:1-2,
	Tehilah (Ps.) 139:12)
	See Note ה.
	 
	
	
	Note: In the Shishaq Hypocephalus, the ratio of the length of the rectangle containing Figures 1, 22 and 
	23, to its height, is roughly the ratio of the length of the Ark of the Covenant (Aron ha-Brit) to its height, or breadth. This ratio is close to
	
	φ, the
	Golden ratio. In the case of 
	the frame surrounding Figures 1, 22 and 23, the approximation of φ is good to at least the rational 
	Fibonacci approximation 3/2 = 1.5. 
	
	
	
	Fig. 2.
	Stands next to Kolob, called by the Ah-meh-strah-ans  [see Note	
	ב] 
  
	
	
	Oliblish
	אל לב ליש, 
which is the next grand governing creation near to the celestial or the place 
	where God resides; holding the key of power also, pertaining to other 
	mazalot 
	מַזָלוׂת; as revealed from God to Avram, as he offered sacrifice upon an 
	altar, which he had built unto
	 
	the  
	Eternal.
	
	Note: The term “planet” 
	comes from the Greek meaning “wanderer” i.e. “wandering stars”, “asteres planetai”. 
	(Jude 1:13)  
	This is not a word that Abram would have used. The expression “fixed planets” 
	(Facsimile 2, 
	Figure 5) appears to be something of an oxymormon, 
	since planets by definition are “wanderers” (manifesting 
	apparent motion 
	in relation to the so called “fixed stars”). The Semitic term “mazalot”, meaning “stars of fortune or fate - lucky stars, 
	abodes of gods” is translated “planets” (KJV), but the word may also 
	refer to “stars” or groups of stars that appear to move together, and appear relatively “fixed” with respect to 
	each other. 
	(LDS Doctrine and Covenants 88:42-43) 
	Scripture combined with the 
	Kirtland Egyptian Papers indicate that dual Oliblish [see Note ד]
	is both a 
	planet (divine abode, 
	like 
	
	missel, 
	
	Na mesile possibly meaning “mazal” 
	 
	
	 
	 
	
	
	מַזָל) and a 
	central 
	
	fixed star. Could the pair of Oliblish-im be massive 
	multi-stellar creations of celestial objects some of which possess crushing gravity - able to interface with,
	 stir, knead, and roll the 
	great  starry arms of the galaxy ? Joseph Smith’s Grammar and Alphabet of the Ah-meh-strah-an 
	Language, 2nd Part, 5th Degree,  ,
	  
	
	pg. 24, 2nd Part, 2nd Degree,  , 
	
	pg. 31.
	
	
	
	 
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	In light of Kolob being the great central galactic nucleus or 
X-shaped
	bulge surrounded by a halo of unseen matter, Oliblish-im 
	(which are double, see Note ד), 
	may be positioned griffin or keruvim 
	like at the bicameral ends with Kolob in between. Thus the Oliblish-im may both orbit central Kolob 
	(planet like) and be in the general fixed direction of the veiled galactic 
	center - the direction of the “mazal” 
	of Sagittarius. (Iyov (Job) 12:22) 
	Alternately, perhaps Oliblish (אל לב 
	ליש = in the heart is the crusher) aptly 
	describes a gamma ray emitting (and therefore life altering) galactic plasma structure, 
	e.g. one of a pair of Fermi lobes or bubbles 
	crowning the crushing center of our galaxy.
	Could it be that one of the time standards “in Kolob” involves an incredibly swift 
	( → c) revolving pillar of plasma?
	See Fig. 4. See Note ה. The  “grand central powers that govern” the structure of the galaxy involve 
	gravitation and plasma electrodynamics.
	  
	
	
	The characters to the left of the standing two-headed god (twin gods, ד) read: “The name 
	of this Mighty God”. (Michael D. Rhodes, “The Joseph Smith Hypocephalus ... Twenty Years Later”, pp. 4-5) 
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	Fig. 3.
	This figure was appropriately copied from a Book of the Dead in 
	Joseph Smith’s possession, and inserted in place of the lacuna 
	(missing portion - upper right hand) of the Shishaq Hypocephalus. Compare with other hypocephali (below). 
	
	  
	  
	
	
	
	Figure 3 Is made 
	to represent God, sitting upon his throne, clothed with power and authority; 
	with a crown of eternal light upon his head; representing also the grand 
	Key-words of the Holy Priesthood, as revealed to ha-Adam in the Garden of 
	Eden, as also to Shet, Noah, 
	
	Malki-tsedeq, Avraham, and all to 
	whom the Priesthood was revealed. 
	
	
	Note: One of the sublime lessons of the hypocephalus is that there is more than one 
	abode and throne of God, and none of them are 
	fixed in absolute space. 
	(LDS Doctrine and Covenants 121:28-32)
	Being near Kolob does not mean centered or 
	stationed at absolute rest. Absolute space fails to exist in an infinite universe. (Devarim (Deut.) 33:26, 
	YehezqEl (Ezek.) 1:26),
	2nd Part, 
	3rd Degree, “E beth Ka”, 
	
	pg. 29. 
	The celestial kingdom of God E-Beth-Ka could be an orbiting throne system of celestial worlds. Near Kolob there could be celestial throne systems both inside and outside the great central 
	“Kokob“ bulge or galactic Holy of Holies. 
	 See Note ה.
	 
	 
	
	  
	
	The characters to the left of the 
	falcon-headed sun god seated on his papyrus barge, read: “Divine ship”. (Michael D. 
	Rhodes, “The Joseph Smith Hypocephalus ... Twenty Years Later”, pp. 
	4,6) 
	
	 
	Appropriately inserted 
	immediately to the left of the papyrus solar ferry 
	(Heb. “avarat-ham”
	
	
	עברת־חם), near Figure 2 in 
	the Church published version, is a little 
	libation stand holding the papyrus and lotus bouquet  . 
	This symbol is interpreted to represent “Abraham in Egypt”. 
	See 
	Figure 10  and 
	
	3 of Facsimiles 1 and 3 respectively (adapted from the Hor Book of 
	Breathings). Now look near the LDS addition 
	Figure 
	2 (Facsimile 2). Note that the papyrus-lotus bouquet symbol does not appear 
	in the original Shishaq Hypocephalus - nor does it appear near the 
	two-headed god in other hypocephali (below). The introduction of the “Abraham in Egypt” papyrus - 
	lotus bouquet, and adjacent “avarat-ham” 
	solar ship (Figure 3) 
	serves to “Abramize” the pagan hypocephalus in ways the Ah-meh-strah-an 
	could relate to. 
	
	
	
	Fig. 4.
	Answers to the Hebrew word 
	Raqiya
	
	רָקִיע, 
signifying expanse, or the firmament of the heavens [see Note 
	
	
	ג]; also a numerical 
	figure, in Ah-meh-strah-an signifying one thousand; answering to the 
	measuring of the time of Oliblish, which is equal with Kolob in its 
	revolution and in its measuring of time. 
	 
	
	 
	
	
	See  
	Ahmehstrahan Counting and Gematria 
				 
	
	 
	
	
	
	Fig. 5.
	Is called in Ah-meh-strah-an Enish-go-on-dosh; this is one of the 
	governing mazalot also, and is said by the Ah-meh-strah-ans to be the Sun, 
	and to borrow its light from Kolob through the medium of Kae-e-vanrash, 
	which is the grand Key, or, in other words, the governing power, which 
	governs fifteen other fixed mazalot or 
	kokhavim 
	כּוׂכָבִים, as also Floeese or the Moon, 
	the Earth and the Sun in their annual revolutions.
	This 
	mazalah receives its power through the 
	medium of Kli-flos-is-es, or Ha-kokhavim, the kokhavim represented by numbers 22 and 23, receiving 
	light from the revolutions of Kolob.  
	
		
	
	
	
	Spelled with the letter “Qoph” 
	
	
	
	
	as in the Hebrew word “qophim”, 
	meaning “apes, 
	monkeys” (22 and 23),“Qol-leb” in this case, 
	means “Voice of the heart”.  (Iyov (Job) 40:9) As suggested in the section 
	Meanings of Kolob,  the Hebrew expression for “near unto me“ (e.g. “qarob elai”, “קָרֹוב֙ אֵלַ֔י” spelled with a monkey in the word qarob) 
	describing Kolob, is a play on words with 
	the Elohit (Adamic) name Kolob in the heart or midst of God’s creation. Compare “Qoph” with
	Ah-meh-strah-an 
	symbol for “Flo-ees The moon”, 2nd Part, 5th 
	Degree,
	 
	
	pg. 25.
	
	 
	
	
	
	
	 
	Note: 
	If the Sun is to be classed with “other fixed ... stars”, 
	and if “the Moon, the Earth and the Sun” are understood to have “annual revolutions”, 
	this is not describing a geocentric model 
	of the universe. According to the 
	cosmological revelation that Abram received by way of Urim v'Tumim, the 
	Earth is a member of an order of “planets” (mazalot, Abraham 3:9). 
	The Earth is not perceived to be a planet (wandering star), or orbiting body in a 
	geocentric model.
	See Joseph Smith’s Grammar and Alphabet of the Ahmehstrahan 
	Language 2nd Part, 3rd Degree,
	
	pp. 29-30 regarding the Sun (Enish-go-ondosh) as a gravitational body and a “fixed star”. Fixed, that is, with respect to other “fixed stars”, yet “central” to the solar system, and moving 
	(planet like) with respect to a greater cosmic center. 
	See Joseph Smith’s Grammar and Alphabet of the Ahmehstrahan 
	Language 2nd Part, 2nd
	Degree, “Flos isis”,
	
	pg. 32. It is likely that governing mazalot or 
	kokhavim extend from 
	the bicameral center of the galaxy into the outer courts or arms of the galactic temple.
	(LDS Doctrine and Covenants 88:51-61) 
	
	
	
	Abraham 3:13
	lists “Kokob” after the Elohit (Adamic) name of the sun. The sun is classed as a “greater light”. 
	
	
	
	“Kokob” is mentioned before the moon, 
	which is an orbiting “lesser light” (Abraham 3:13), with the understanding that “Kokaubeam 
	.. signifies ... all the great lights ... in the firmament of heaven” 
	(compare Abraham 4:16, Iyov (Job) 25:5). It was revealed to Abram   
	
	that the Kokaubeam “were very great” (Abraham 3:2) 
	apparently at great distances, and were not mere points of light in the night sky. The sun is then a kokab, 
	translated “star”, and the moon a mazalah, translated “planet”. 
	The planet earth is a more central body in the earth moon system, wherein 
	satellite
	orbital motion decreases with distance from the barycenter; but there are 
	other orbital systems with different barycenters. (Abraham 3:5-9)
	As for 
	how the sun can be both a fixed star and a “planet”; consider that it takes the sun more than two hundred million earth years 
	to complete one orbit (planet like) around the great galactic center in company with other “fixed stars”(one  
	 Galactic Year, LDS Doctrine and Covenants 88:43-44).  Joseph Smith’s Kirtland Egyptian Papers 
	do not support the idea that Abraham’s cosmological revelation is 
	exclusively framed in an astrological, geocentric model. The Book of Mormon 
	departs from a geocentric model. (Alma 30:44,
Helaman 12:15)
	Moreover, Joseph never said that the great 
	governing center of our local universe could be seen by unaided human eyes. In fact he (by way of scribes) suggested the opposite. 
		(Joseph Smith’s Grammar and Alphabet of the Ahmehstrahan 
	Language, 2nd Part, 5th Degree, “Flos isis”,
	 
	
	pg. 25)
See also TETRAGRAMMATON AND EARTH, and Note ה.
	
	 Figure 5 
	is understood by mainstream Egyptologists to represent the sky goddess Hathor, 
	who in fact, is affiliated with the sun. Hathor is here 
	depicted as the maternal, heavenly cow. See Ritner on Figure No. 5. But the 
	Hebraic minded, may see in the bovine symbol a connection to “eleph”, 
	a Hebrew word for “cattle” or “kine”. It happens that “eleph” is also the Hebrew word for one “thousand (1000)”. (Tehilim (Ps.) 90:4)
	
 “Eleph” 
	relates to, and is spelled with the letter “aleph”. In fact, it is spelled the same as “aleph” ( אלף), or “alaph”
   
 - which suggests being yoked together, bound, the learner to the teacher, the lesser and the greater, the 
	satellite and the central body.
	 Ah-meh-strah-ans in Ptolemaic times
 could have recognized 
	that aleph is equivalent to the number one in Hebrew Gematria.
	Just as Figure 4   (next to Figure 2, Oliblish) 
	communicates information by way of 
	Hebraic/Ahmehstrahan Gematria about “the measuring of the time of Oliblish”,    
	so figure 5 (next to Figure 1, Kolob) can be seen to symbolize that one day with 
	El   is a thousand (eleph) 
	solar years. There is therefore a sense in which Figure 5 relates to Figure 
	1, much as Figure 4 relates to Figure 2. 
	
	Fig. 6.
	Represents this earth in her four quarters  .  The Ah-meh-strah-an 
	name for 
	this earth under the unified governing influence of interplanetary 
	and interstellar agencies
	is similar in pronunciation to the sacred
	Tetragrammaton. 
	See Note א.
	The Earth is a member of 
	an order of “planets” according to Abraham 3:9. 
	
	 
	
	
	
	Fig. 7.
	Represents
		 
	
	Virile 
	God [see Note  
	
	
	ד]
	
	sitting upon his throne, revealing through the heavens 
	the grand Key-words of the 
	Priesthood; as, also, the sign of 
	
	Ruah ha-Qodesh 
	unto Avram, in the form of a dove (adapted from the symbol of an erect, 
	virile serpent with legs; consider 
	B'sorot Matti 10:16).
	  
	
	Note: Modifying Figure 7 so that the 
	Egyptian virility symbol 
	 discreetly appears to represent an arm, doesn’t necessarily change the intended meaning 
	(from an Ah-meh-strah-an point of view). The Hebrew word for “arm”,  
	
	“z’roa”
	 
	
	(זְרׂעַ), 
	is akin to the word for “seed”, “zera” (זֶרַע). 
	
	
	
	
	
	Consider Messianic Yesha’Yahu (Is.) 48:14; 
52:10;
53:1,
10.
	The name of the Egyptian god of virility sounds like the Hebrew word “min” 
	( מִין)
	in connection with “kind” of seed.
	
	
	
	
	Fig. 8.
	Contains writings that cannot be revealed unto the world; but is to 
	be had in the Holy Temple of God. 
	
	
	  
	
	The 
	characters read: “may the soul of Osiris Shishaq (Sheshonq) be granted 
	life”. (Michael D. Rhodes, “The Joseph Smith Hypocephalus ... Twenty Years Later”, pp. 4-5) The line may be interpreted to signify the birth/resurrection 
	unto eternal lives of the exalted individual (e.g. Shishaq) as 
	ha-Adam, analogue to the god Osiris, accompanied by his eternal companion 
	Havah 
	(Life), analogue to the throne goddess 
	Isis; the details of which are presented in the 
	Holy
 Temple. (Bereshit (Gen.) 3:22) 
	
	
	
	Fig. 9. Ought not to be revealed at the present time; 
	possibly referring to mysteries (ordinances) pertaining to the “afterworld” (eternity, the cosmos), 
	“and of his great waters” (possibly including 
	ha-shamayim 
	or the heavens, Father's (I9) great (O29) galactic 
	arm (D36) veiling the heavens, amah  or 
	z'roa - based on Joseph’s supplemented characters. Consider 
	 
	Facsimile 1, Figure 12.
	Consider 
	LDS Doctrine and Covenants 121:26-32. 
	Consider also the five points of fellowship with the Star of the 
	afterworld (N15), 
	Bemidbar (Num.) 24:17, 
	Revelation 2:28-29; 
	22:16 - the living Star of the 
	house (O1) of 
	bread (X1), 
	Bet -
	lehem, 
	Bethlehem, Mikhah (Micah) 5:1-2)
	
	 
	
	  
	
	The 
	characters read: “[God] of the hereafter, and of his great waters”. (Michael 
	D. Rhodes, “The Joseph Smith Hypocephalus ... Twenty Years Later”, pp. 
	4-5) 
	
	
	Fig. 
	10. Also. Consider 
	LDS Doctrine and Covenants 133:39-45 
	
	  
	
	The 
	characters read: “O Mighty God, Lord of heaven and earth”. (Michael D. 
	Rhodes, “The Joseph Smith Hypocephalus ... Twenty Years Later”, pp. 
	4-5) 
	
	
	
	Fig. 
	11. Also.   
	
	  
	
	The 
	characters read: “O God of the Sleeping Ones from the time of [the creation]”. 
	(Michael D. Rhodes, “The Joseph Smith Hypocephalus ... Twenty Years Later”, 
	pp. 4-5) 
	
	
	If the 
	world can find out these numbers [enumerated lines of characters and 
	gematria ], so let it be.  
	Amen. 
		 
	
	
	
	
	See  
	Ahmehstrahan 
				Counting and Gematria 
				 
	 
		
		
		 
		
		
		
	
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 
	 
	 
		 
	
	
		 
	
	
	
	
	 
	 
	 
	
	
	
	Lines 11,10,9 and 8 read in order: “O God of the Sleeping Ones from 
	the time of the creation. O Mighty God, Lord of heaven and earth, of the 
	hereafter, and of his great waters, may the soul of Osiris Shishaq (Sheshonq) 
	be granted life.” (Michael D. Rhodes, “The Joseph Smith Hypocephalus … 
	Twenty Years Later”, pg. 5)
	
	
		
		
		
	
		
	
	
	
	
	Figures 
	12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, and 21, will be given in the own due 
	time of  the 
	
	Eternal.  
	
	  
	
	The 
	characters associated with Figures 21, 20 and 19 read: “You will ever be as 
	that God, the Busirian [Osiris]”. (Michael D. Rhodes, “The Joseph Smith Hypocephalus ... Twenty Years Later”, pp. 4-5)  
	
	  
	
	
	Figure 18, outer edge or rim, reads: “I am the Provider in the 
	Sun Temple in 
	Heliopolis. [I am] most exalted and very glorious. [I 
	am] a virile bull without equal. [I am] the Mighty God in the 
	Sun Temple in 
	Heliopolis. <May the Osiris Shishaq [Sheshonq] live 
	forever> with the Mighty God in Heliopolis.” <Missing text 
	reconstruction based on British
 Museum hypocephali> (Michael D. Rhodes, “The Joseph Smith Hypocephalus ... Twenty Years Later”, pp. 2, 4-5) 
	
	  
	
	
	Figures 17, 16 read: “May this tomb never be desecrated, and may this soul 
	and its lord never be desecrated in the hereafter.” (Michael D. Rhodes, “The Joseph Smith Hypocephalus ... Twenty Years Later”, pp. 2, 4-5) 
	
	
		Figures 12 through 15 
	are missing hieroglyphs. In the LDS publication of Facsimile 2, the missing 
	hieroglyphs are filled in with hieratic characters 
	copied from 
	the Hor Book of Breathings - a separate funerary work, written in a 
	different type of Egyptian. The presentation 
	comes across, at first, as an unwitting mix of legitimate hieroglyphic 
	text, and commandeered, upside-down, inverted, broken, and redundant Egyptian 
	shorthand; put in place for the sake of appearance. 
	
	
		It would appear that the Prophet Joseph Smith did not read hieratic or 
	hieroglyphic Egyptian as current scholars do. Its true that everything he 
	learned about the Egyptian texts, he learned by way of 
	inspiration/revelation. But notwithstanding the revelations, by the spring 
	of 1842, in the midst of American Egyptomania, Times and Seasons 
	readers were told they would have to
	
	wait for “the own due time of the Lord” 
	to understand significant portions of the curious Facsimile 2. 
	The Prophet would not publish made-up meanings for the hieroglyphic text, or 
	for the inserted hieratic characters with the object of catering to an 
	inquiring public. 
	
	
	Recently, LDS scholars have tended to suggest that the Prophet was referring 
	just to the original hieroglyphs of Figures 12 through 15 etc. and their 
	meanings, as the things to be 
	
	
	“given in the own due time of the Lord”. But its appears more 
	reasonable, as one examines Joseph’s published Facsimile 2, that he was 
	referring to both hieroglyphs and the supplemented hieratic characters.  
	
	 
	
	
	
	 The idea that the Prophet would arbitrarily insert characters in place 
	of missing hieroglyphs for the sake of appearance, becomes more disturbing the more one thinks about it. If the copied hieratic 
	characters don’t make sense - maybe they aren’t being interpreting the way 
	Ah-meh-strah-ans would? 
	As for the missing hieroglyphs; hasn’t some knowledgeable person guessed 
	what they might be, based on 
	a study of other hypocephali? 
	
	 
	
	
	The answer is 
	yes! Having examined similar 
	hieroglyphs on other hypocephali, LDS Egyptologist Val Sederholm, suggests 
	that the missing hieroglyphs of figures 12 though 15 might read: “j 
	nTr pfy 'A, 'nx m TAw, jw m mw: 'q r' jw [=r] sDm md.t=f. [Mj n] Wsjr”, 
	which translates: “I invoke that special, particular, transcendent god, who 
	lives by breathing, who negotiates the waters: So may 
	Re [the sun god] descend to hear 
	Osiris’ words. Come to Osiris Shoshenq.” Sederholm thus interprets 
	the restored hieroglyphic text (Figures 12 through 15) to be a prayer for 
	rescue - a prayer befitting the resurrection/deliverance of 
	Osiris Hor/Abram as depicted in 
	 
	Facsimile 1. 
	
	(Recovering the Missing Hieroglyphs on the Right Panels of LDS Book of Abraham Facsimile 2) 
	
	
	
		There is no question as to who arranged the hieratic writing, 
	inserted in place of the 
	lacunae (missing parts) of the Sheshonq Hypocephalus. The Prophet’s  
	own diary records: 
	
	4 March 1842 - Friday 
	
	 “Exhibiting the Book of Abraham, in the original [i.e. 
		facsimiles, cut from more than one scroll, compiled with the English manuscript], To Bro Reuben Hadlock
		[Hedlock]. so that he might take the size of the several plates 
		or cuts. & prepare the blocks for the Times & Seasons. & also 
		gave 
		instruction concerning the arrangement of the writing on the Large cut
		 
		[hypocephalus 
		-  Facsimile 2]. illustrating the principles of Astronomy...
		” (Joseph Smith’s Illinois Journal - 
		emphasis added) 
	
	
	 
		 
	
	
	Joseph Smith’s redacted 
	hypocephalus accompanied the publication of the
	Book of Abraham in the
	Times and Seasons newspaper (15 March 
	1842).  The hypocephalus features 
	hieratic characters copied from the Hor Book of Breathings inserted in place of missing hieroglyphs. 
	Joseph Smith’s insertions are inverted, or upside-down relative to 
	adjacent hieroglyphs. This raises several questions: If the sole purpose of 
	inserting the characters was to give the appearance of completeness, why copy 
	characters from a separate Egyptian scroll? Why not copy hieroglyphs from 
	the hypocephalus itself? Could the selection and inversion of the hieratic 
	characters be deliberate? Indeed the Prophet “gave instruction concerning 
	the arrangement of the writing”. Is it possible then that the inserted 
	hieratic writing was not intended to represent continuations of the hieroglyphic 
	text? Could the hieratic characters be arranged and interpreted so as to 
	mean something – perhaps relating to Abraham? Like the papyrus and lotus 
	bouquet symbol added next to Figure 2, could the inserted hieratic 
	characters be part of the effort to “Abramize” the pagan hypocephalus?
	 We are suggesting here that the 
	Prophet was redacting and reinterpreting the hypocephalus Ah-meh-strah-an 
	style. Many of the hieratic characters inserted in the hypocephalus were 
	the same characters used to correlate with the
	Book of Abraham narrative (1835 
	manuscripts). These 
	characters are to be interpreted in Ah-meh-strah-an transtextual ways. In 
	other words Joseph Smith adapted the funerary facsimiles (including the hypocephalus), and 
	reinterpreted them in ways that parallel an ancient Ah-meh-strah-an version 
	of the Book of Abram.  See Note ו. 
	
	  
	
	  
	
	  
	
	
	Hieratic characters (lines 1 through 4) from the Hor Book of Breathings, 
	transposed into hieroglyphic Egyptian. (Hugh Nibley, The Message of the 
	Joseph Smith Papyri - An Egyptian Endowment, Chapter 2) Note: It is possible that 
	the Hedlock carving of Facsimile 2 (printing block for the Times and 
	Seasons newspaper), confuses a set of characters from line 1 of the Hor Book of Breathings,
	with a set of similar characters appearing in line 2. In other words, 
	the apparent redundancy (seen on the upper right-hand rim of the hypocephalus) may not 
	be.  
	
	  
	
	
		For a translation of the Hor Book of Breathings, including parts 
	inserted in the missing portions of the Shishaq Hypocephalus, see Hugh 
	Nibley’s The Message of the Joseph Smith Papyri - An Egyptian 
	Endowment, Chapter 2.  
	
	
		For Ah-meh-strah-an styled interpretations of many of 
	these characters, see Esoteric Egyptian in the Margins of the Book of Abraham and 
	Esoteric Egyptian in Facsimile No. 2. 
	
	
	The 
	above translation is given as far as we have any right to give at the 
	present time. 
	
	
	NOTES: 
	
	א 
	Joseph Smith, Grammar and Alphabet of the 
	Egyptian (Ah-meh-strah-an) Language, 5th Degree 
	pp. 5 -
	6, 
	Zub Zoal eh, Zab zoal; 4th Degree 
	pg. 11, 
	Zub-zaol-eh; 3rd Degree 
	pg. 14, 
	Auk eh, Zub-zool-eh; 2nd Degree 
	pg. 18, 
	Ahe, Zubzooleh; 1st Degree 
	pg. 21, 
	Oan, Zubzool eh; Second part 1st Degree 
	pg. 33, 
	Bethku-ain-tri-eth. 
	
	  
	
	
	
	Astronomical symbol of the Earth
	
	The original explanation to Fig. 1 presents another 
	term for the earth. This name is also found in Joseph Smith’s Egyptian 
	(Ah-meh-strah-an) Alphabet and Grammar. The astronomical symbol of the 
	earth (in her four quarters) is there associated with an anglicized name 
	similar to the Tetragrammaton. 
	The following explanation accompanies the name: “the earth under the government of another …” See Second 
	part 5th Degree, 
	pg. 24; 
	Second part 4th Degree, 
	pg. 27; 
	Second part 3rd Degree, 
	pg 29; 
	Second part 2nd Degree, 
	pg. 31; 
	Second part 1st Degree, 
	pg. 33. 
	
	  
	
	
	The symbol that I choose to call the “Ah-meh-strah-an Cross of Adon”, signifying the 
	rule of the Eternal over the Earth and 
	her divisions, also signifying the celestial compass and square. The ancient letters of 
	the sacred
	
	Tetragrammaton appearing in their quarters, are read in endless round. The hieroglyphs represent (1) 
	the open hand and forearm, (2) a man with upraised arms in the act of 
	prayerful praise or petition, (3) the nail or tent peg. This symbol can act as “and” 
	- joining words as if by a nail. The hieroglyphs may be 
	interpreted to denote, “He who will ever be and who 
	ever was”.  
	
	The “chariot wheel 
	of tevel 
	תֵבֵל (the world)” is symbolized with crossed spokes. The letter “tav” as in 
	“tumeykha” (thy perfections), 
	and “tevel” 
	(world), was represented 
	anciently by the 
	mark of the cross. 
	The letter “tet”, as in the Elohim saw their creation to be “tov” 
	(good), 
	was similarly represented by the 
	circle and mark 
	in X fashion. The Ah-meh-strah-an association of the sacred name 
	of the Eternal 
	
	with the earth may relate to the fact that “yah.t”, an Egyptian word for 
	“earth”, is somewhat similar to the divine name. See Michael 
	D. Rhodes, “The Joseph Smith Hypocephalus … Twenty Years Later”, pg. 8. 
	See also 
	TETRAGRAMMATON AND EARTH.
	 
	
	ב
	  Joseph Smith’s, 
	Grammar and Alphabet of the 
	Egyptian (Ah-meh-strah-an) Language, 5th Degree 
	
	pg. 6 identifies “Egypt” as “Ah-meh-strah”. 
	Does the word “Ah-meh-strah” relate to the Hebrew “matsor”, suggesting a “limiting boundary, 
	or border”, a “defense”; as in the mighty Nile “streams of 
	defense” (Yesha’Yahu (Is.) 19:6)? 
	Is “Ah-meh-strah” related to “Mitsraymah”, translated 
	“Egypt” in the 
	KJV? 
	
	
	Is “Ah-meh-strah” related to “Ahme-as” which means “God without beginning or end”, 
	according to the Prophet (pg. 33).
Or does “Ah-meh-strah”relate to “amah - sitrah” (אמה־סתרה), 
	meaning “forearm, mother-city” is “shelter, protection”? 
	(Devarim (Deut.) 32:37-38, 
	Abraham 2:16)
	
	The “Ah meh strah ans” are the unique “Egyptians” behind the 
	esoteric interpretations of funerary facsimiles supplementing a later 
	version of the Book of Abram.  
	The Ahmehstrahan society may be viewed as a partial, or preparatory fulfillment of 
	Yesha’Yahu (Is.) 19:21. 
	
	ג 
 
	 Formerly spelled “Raukeeyang”, Joseph Smith exhibits the 
	Western Sephardic pronunciation of his Hebrew Instructor Joshua 
	(James) Seixas. See J. Seixas, Manual Hebrew Grammar, pg.12. The case in which “raqiya” 
	(firmament or expanse) is pronounced “rau-kee-ng” 
	(Seixas) dates to Italian and Western Portuguese Jewish communities of 
	the late 16th  century CE. See Aron di Leone Leoni, “The 
	Pronunciation of Hebrew in the Western Sephardic Settlements (16th 
	– 20th  Centuries). Second Part: 
	The Pronunciation of the Consonant ‘Ayin”, 	
	SEFARAD, Vol. 
	68.1, 2008, pp. 163-208. 
	
	ד 
	
	  
	
		
		
		
		Hypocephalus of Tasheritkhons (circa 305 to 330 BCE), British Museum, London 
	
		
		
		
		
	
	
		
	 
	 
		 
		
		   
		
		  
		
		
		Hypocephalus of the Lady Ta-khred-Khonsu (M. Lyon, “Appreciating 
		Hypocephali as Works of Art and Faith”, FARMS Book of Abraham Lecture 
		Series, 1999) 
		
		  
		
		  
		
		
		Hypocephalus of the Lady Wst-wrt (M. Lyon, “Appreciating Hypocephali as 
		Works of Art and Faith”, FARMS Book of Abraham Lecture Series, 1999) 
		
	ה 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		
		
		
	Sagittarius A* is not Kolob. It’s in Kolob! 
		
		.JPG)  
		
	
		
		
	
		
		
	“Kolob 
	in the second degree. It signfies the wonder of Abraham the 
	eldest of all the stars, the 
	greatest body of the heavenly bodies that ever was discovered by man” 
(Grammar and Alphabet of the Ah-meh-strah-an 
	Language 2nd Part, 2nd Degree, “Kolob”,
	
	pg. 32.) 
	
	
“Kolob in the first degree, It signifies the first great grand governing 
	fixed Star which is the fartherest that ever has been discovered by the fathers which was discovered by Methuselar and also by Abraham” 
(Grammar and Alphabet of the Ah-meh-strah-an 
	Language, 2nd Part, 1st Degree, “Kolob”,
	
	pg. 34.) 
		
	  
		
The super massive black hole Sagittarius A* does not “govern” by the 
“power of attraction”, nor 
“regulate” the revolutions and orbits 
of all the stars and planets of our local universe – the Milky Way. It isn’t the great securing nail of heaven holding our galaxy together. It is true that Sagittarius A* is at the 
center of our galaxy, which galaxy is an enormous 
merkabah or 
portable temple. But “super massive” Sagittarius A* lacks the gravitational mass 
and field to truly control and influence the structure of the galaxy. See AI 
discussion below: 
		
Our galaxy is one of countless heavenly temples in relative motion throughout the universe. The Kolob 
 Holy of Holies of each heavenly temple is the 
galactic bulge. The shining galactic bulge is surrounded by a halo of invisible matter. 
The collective gravitational mass of the galactic bulge is orders of magnitude 
greater than Sagittarius A*. Sagittarius A* cannot by itself be Kolob. It’s in 
Kolob, that is, the black hole (a mere sink in the temple) is in the Holy of Holies 
of our galaxy. 
		
  
 
	
Figures 1, 22, and 23 represent a multi-stellar creation, Michael Lyon, 
  
KOLOB (Note 
X-shaped bulge)		 
Another Kolob, the one at the heart of the Andromeda Galaxy (M31), is the 
oldest, 
largest, 
most distant object that ancient humans could have observed in the nighttime sky with the unaided eye. M31 was likely seen by ancient Hebrews and could have been described as 
“kokab ka-leb be-anan”, “a star as the heart in a cloud”.
 (Abraham 3:13,
	16) 
But in order to detect the Kolob of our own galactic home, veiled from our gaze behind nebular curtains 
(Isaiah 64:1), extraordinary telescopes capable of detecting 
“urim”, “lights” (e.g. infrared, and x-rays) invisible to the human eye must be employed.
(Psalm 139:12) “Urim and Thummim” 
were used by Abram to view the great veiled Kolob of our galaxy. But the Kolob at 
the heart of the Andromeda galaxy could be seen by shepherds in the nighttime 
sky. 
		
The governing heart of M31, seen by unaided human eyes, is much more distant 
than the unseen bulge of our galaxy.
(Grammar and Alphabet of the Ah-meh-strah-an 
	Language, 2nd Part, 1st Degree, “Kolob”,
	
	pg. 34.) Its relative motion is indeed “swifter” than the relative 
motion of stars in the vicinity of our solar system. (Fast Stars and Hotrod Galaxies ~ Vesto Slipher’s Astonishing Discovery of Galactic Redshifts) 
 
		
Were the veiled galactic bulge to vanish with its far reaching gravitational field, the arms of the galaxy (in which our tiny earth is nestled, 
Abraham 3:3,
9) would fly apart into outer darkness. That’s how powerful and important Kolob is. 
If all 
	fifteen of the governing fixed stars had the same mass as Sagittarius A*, 
and were located near the galactic center, this would still only represent a 
tiny fraction of the gravitational governance of the galactic bulge - Kolob! 
		
Kolob (at the heart of a spiral galaxy) has more than one time standard, one of which, “a day unto the Lord”, 
corresponds to “one thousand years” on our earth. Though the 
annual cycle of Kolob through galactic “seasons” (moedim) “moveth in order more slow” compared to the 
orbital velocity of our solar system
 around the galaxy, yet the angular velocity of the 
great galactic bulge is “swifter”. The 
provided Kolob Reality Check calculator, indicates that a galactic bulge 
year is on the order of about 100,000,000 earth years. (LDS Doctrine and Covenants 88:44) 
		
There are various possible scenarios within the massive bulge and superposed halo, in which clock slowing effects due to
 gravitational potential, 
and possibly also 
orbital speed, 
may result in the passing of only one earth millennium 
“in Kolob” for each 
outer revolution of the galactic bulge. The earth clock-rate, in this case, is practically 
equivalent to that of a
		
		
		
		chronometer held at galactic arm’s length 
  
from the dense galactic center. In other words, imagine a clock calibrated to register time in earth years 
orbiting in the arm of the galaxy at a 
galactic cubit 
from the heart of the galaxy. Now imagine that clock placed in orbit at an appropriate place “in Kolob”. 
It registers only one earth millennium when Kolob 
completes one outer revolution. This is one of several possible interpretations 
relating to Abraham 3:4, 
Psalm 84:10, 
2 Peter 3:8. 
Keep in mind that days and years are sometimes prophetically interchangeable in scripture. (Ezekiel 4:5-6, 
Revelation 12:6, 
JST, Revelation 12:5) 
		
See  . 
		On Tue., Dec. 3, 2024, 2:21 p.m. Vincent Coon, <… > 
		wrote: 
		Romolo, 
		I have added to the commentary about Figure 1 in 
		[Joseph Smith’s Book of the Dead Hypocephalus] . 
		Could I please share with you and AI another question, one that I’m  not sure that ChatGPT has the wherewithal to answer correctly. Here it is: 
		If the black hole (Sagittarius A*) at the center of the Milky Way galaxy were to suddenly vanish along with its gravitational field, would there still be enough gravitational mass in the galactic bulge (including dark matter) to hold the galaxy together? 
		On Tue., Dec. 3, 2024, 7:11 p.m. Romolo Simonetti, <… >  wrote: 
		Hi Vincent, 
		Great question. 
		Here's what ChatGPT spits out. I wondered how does it know what you mean by galactic bulge from its response: 
		[Answer: "galactic bulge" is an accepted scientific description. V. C.] 
	
		
		
		
	
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		
		Yes, the Milky Way Galaxy would remain largely intact if Sagittarius A* (the supermassive black hole at its center) and its gravitational influence were to suddenly vanish. Here’s why: 
		Mass Contribution of Sagittarius A* 
		Sagittarius A* has an estimated mass of about
		
		4 
		million solar masses. While this is immense, it is 
		relatively small compared to the total mass of the Milky Way, which is 
		around 
		1.5 
		trillion solar masses (including dark matter). The 
		supermassive black hole contributes less than 
		
		0.0003% of the galaxy's total mass. 
		
		Gravitational Influence of the Galactic Bulge
		The 
		
		galactic bulge, which surrounds Sagittarius A*, contains 
		billions of stars, gas, and dust. This region alone has a mass of around
		
		100 
		billion solar masses, vastly exceeding that of the black 
		hole. The gravitational influence of this bulge is the primary force 
		binding stars in the inner parts of the galaxy. 
		
		Role of Dark Matter
		The majority of the Milky Way's mass resides in its dark matter halo, which extends far beyond the visible components of the galaxy. Dark matter is responsible for most of the galaxy's gravitational potential, providing the force necessary to hold the stars, gas, and dust in orbit even at great distances from the galactic center. 
		
		What Would Happen Without Sagittarius A*?
		
			- 
			
			Central Stars and Gas: The orbits of stars and gas 
			very close to Sagittarius A* (within a few light-years) would be 
			disrupted. These objects currently orbit the black hole due to its 
			strong gravitational pull, and without it, they would disperse.
 
			- 
			
			Overall Galactic Stability: The rest of the galaxy, 
			including the spiral arms and stars farther out, would remain 
			unaffected because their orbits are determined primarily by the mass 
			distribution in the bulge and the dark matter halo.
 
		 
		
		In Summary
		Sagittarius A* is not structurally critical to the 
		galaxy as a whole. Its absence would cause changes in the dynamics of 
		the immediate central region, but the Milky Way would remain bound and 
		stable due to the overwhelming gravitational influence of the galactic 
		bulge and dark matter halo. 
		
		  
		Kolob Reality Check 
		
	ו 
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
	The Saints were given a version of the Book of Abram that they deserved 
	
		
	A new colleague asked the following questions on the topic of the Book of Abraham:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 3:44 PM Michael <…> wrote: 
		
		“I am grateful for the very special treasure known as The Book of Abraham. I am excited to learn about the manner of it:s translation.  What also brings me joy is its content. Critics demand that if they do not know the exact manner of translation then they will reject its value. That is like saying if an exotic fruit appears like a banana but tastes like a delicious orange then why enjoy it.  Huh?  How absurd!  The Book of Abraham is a precious fruit from the tree of life. I once read it was a gift to the Saints because they accepted the Book of Mormon. If anyone knows where this statement can be found please forward the reference.  I also read  that Joseph Smith said that Facsimile # 2 was the Creation and Jacob's Ladder (The Ascension)!  Again if anyone knows of this quote please forward it. This is also  very curious because Jewish Mystics believe the greatest and most secret mysteries are of these very two topics . Ascension and Creation! Furthermore  the ancient Egyptian religion is about the Resurrection Ascension and Heavenly Enthronement. of the Pharaoh.  It is an Ascension  Rrite and text.   Humm Does this  not also follow  Jesus'  Resurrection, Ascension and Enthronement ? Or Abraham's  life's experiences which are also in similitude. i.e. salvation from death, the light that gives the power of ascension, and the enthronement?  See Facsimiles 1-3. What is the BOA telling us?  What mysteries can we unlock? Why are Hebrew words used?  The game is afoot.” 
		
	Colleague T McKnight responded: 
		
	“Michael, I don't know if this helps, but there is this: 
		
	"We stayed at Kirtland about a week and had the privilege of hearing Joseph preach in that thing the Baptist said they called a meetinghouse [temple], which proved to be a very good house. We went into the upper rooms, saw the Egyptian mummies, the writing that was said to be written in Abraham's day, Jacob's ladder being pictured on it, and lots more wonders that I cannot write here, and that were explained to us." 
		
		History of Sarah Studevant Leavitt, copied by Juanita Leavitt Pulsipher …” 
		
	Colleague V. Coon responded: 
		
	“Hi Mi-ka-El? You may know that your name is a question! What is the answer? 
		
	Fruit has its place on the gospel menu but so does meat. 
		
	I urge the Saints to settle in their minds and hearts a hierarchy of authority giving more weight to the Standard Works and verifiable statements by the Prophet Joseph Smith. 
		
	Regarding the Book of Abraham being a blessing to the Saints for accepting the Book of Mormon, one could make an argument to that effect based on 3 Nephi 26:9 
		
	9 And when they shall have received this, which is expedient that they should have first, to try their faith, and if it shall so be that they shall believe these things then shall the greater things be made manifest unto them. 
		
	But we should also be aware that at the time the Book of Abraham came forth, Europe and America were afflicted with 
	Egytomania. The prophet was encouraged to show that he could translate Egyptian. Not unlike those of old (Jacob 4:14) , the Saints “sought for things that they could not understand … 
	And because they desired it God …” gave them a version of the ancient Sepher Avram (rather, an inspired, anachronistically embellished work  “purporting to be the writings of Abraham” 
	[Joseph Smith’s original T&S introduction to the Book of Abraham]) that they deserved. That is, God gave them through his Prophet, a work of inspired scripture suited to their desires and interests. 
	[As an example of words purportedly written by the "hand of Father Abraham" upon 
	Egyptian papyrus, see Esoteric Egyptian in Facsimile No. 2. Especially see “ The hand 
	of father 
	Avraham  
	wrote this upon papyrus ”] You may see the Saints as being rewarded for their faithfulness in receiving the Book of Mormon.  But God saw things a little differently, understanding that faithfulness comes in degrees. Please see LDS D&C 84:54-59
		
	On page 305 of Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, you will find what ostensibly appears to be the Prophet’s interpretation of Jacob’s ladder. 
	[Genesis 28:12-13] This statement may be inspired, but I have not found it to be a verified statement by the Prophet. On page 283 of The Words of Joseph Smith, Notes for 21 May, 1843, Joseph reportedly said something about “Ladder and rainbow”. I have come across no verifiable statement by Joseph Smith comparing the Hypocephalus to Jacob’s ladder though the idea is inspiring! Teachings 
	[of the P.J.S.] relies a lot on HC  [History of the Church] which is a redacted and amplified compilation that is less reliable (academically) than the Joseph Smith Papers. 
		
	So what is Facsimile 2? You could say it touches on “the three principal rounds of Jacob’s ladder-the telestial, the terrestrial, and the celestial glories 
	of [or] kingdoms” (Teachings, pg. 305) You could suggest, as I have suggested, that it represents the Great Cosmic Household or Heavenly Temple of God. It did not exist in the original 
	Sepher 
	 
	Avram. It is not a restoration dating back to the hand of Abram or Joseph of Egypt. At Joseph Smith’s direction, 
	the Book of the Dead Hypocephalus of Sheshonq was “Abramized”! It was commandeered by the Prophet from an Egyptian funerary papyrus, modified, amplified in meaning, and inserted with things that were not there in the original Egyptian Hypocephalus of Sheshonq. It was converted to something representing the astronomical revelations of Abram, much as the “Ah-meh-strah-ans” (“Egyptians”) themselves were converted to the worship of 
	Yah by Abram’s teachings! Does this inspired process qualify as “translation”? Yes, a prophet’s definition of “translation”! But none of the facsimiles of the Book of Abraham are original to the Sepher Avram. The revealed English text of the Book of Abraham (based on the ancient Sepher Avram) is the true pearl placed in a quasi-Egyptian clamshell for world wide [worldwide] 19th century + audiences.” 
		
		  
		
		
		
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
	
		
	
	Back to
	
	 
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
		
	Abraham in Egypt and the Papyrus Solar 
	Ferry
	
	
		
	
	
		
	
		
		
	
		
		
		
	 Back to
	
	
	
	 
		
		
	
		
		
	
	
		
	
	
	
	
		Esoteric Egyptian in the Margins of the Book of Abraham
		
		
		
		
	  On to 
	
	
	
		
	
	
	Esoteric Egyptian in Facsimile No. 2
		
		  
		
		
		 
	
	
	 
	
	
	Vincent Coon 
	
	
	
	
	 
	וִינְסֶנט
	כּוּן
	
	
	© Copyright 2016
	
	 
	
	
 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		| 
 
	  |  
	 
	
     |